When I think back to my childhood, I can usually come up
with a handful of memories that have stayed with me through the years: spinning
on the tire swing in my grandma’s backyard, the time my family and I drove 530
miles to reach Big Bend National Park, or the time my brothers and I were
certain our babysitter had unknowingly swallowed the tadpole we’d caught using a
plastic cup. But when I try to remember anything prior to the age of five, I
tend to draw a blank.
Over the past decade, studies have provided evidence as to why after a
certain age, most people can’t seem to recall early childhood memories.
Professor of Psychology Patricia Bauer and Research Associate Marina Larkina,
PhD, both of Emory University, decided to study the memories of a group of
children over time, keeping track of which memories remained consistent and
which were forgotten. They began by recording a group of three-year-old children
discussing recent events—such as a vacation or visiting a relative—with their
parents. Bauer and Larkina tracked the children’s ability to recollect the
discussed memories as they got older.
According to their findings, children as old as seven could
recall more than 60 percent of such events. By the age of eight or nine,
however, less than 40 percent were still able to recall the recorded memories.
“What we observed was actually the onset of childhood amnesia,” Bauer said. She
explains that although scientists don’t have a definite answer, this decline in
memory is likely related to the structures and circuits in the brain that store
events for future recall.
Bauer writes that forgetting is a critical component
of childhood amnesia and references a “forgetting function” demonstrated by
Scott E. Wetzler and Robert M. Sweeney in their 1986 study “Childhood Amnesia: An Empirical
Demonstration,” which can be found in Autobiographical
Memory, edited by David C. Rubin. The function is based on memories from
age eight until adulthood, and then it is applied to data from birth to age
six. Wetzler and Sweeney observed that in childhood, the rate of forgetting is
accelerated. Bauer suggests that with more systematic studies of children of
different ages, “we will likely see that within the period of childhood,
memories formed at age eight years and older would be forgotten at a slower
rate, relative to memories formed at the ages of four and six years, for
example.”
Bauer stresses [PDF link] the difference between explicit
memory and implicit memory,
explaining that the different forms of memory are supported by different neural
substrates. Explicit memory (or declarative memory), she explains,
allows for the recall and recollection of dates, places, names, and events. Implicit
memory (or nondeclarative memory) is
something that is recalled through repetition and previous experience. A good
example would be “muscle memory” (a type of procedural
memory), where an action is performed over and over until a person can do
it without consciously thinking about it. Bauer states that this difference is
critical for “the accurate description of the timing and course of memory development
and neurodevelopmental models of age-related changes in memory.” She also states
that the development of memory through childhood deals primarily with explicit
memory.
With more time and research, Bauer posits that the rate of
forgetting would indeed be proven faster depending on age. The implications
that this could have aren’t entirely clear, but would nonetheless have a
profound influence on our understanding of how
memory works.
Did You Know?
In 1997, Tony
Dottino introduced the USA
National Memory Championship, billed as “an Olympiad for ‘thinking’ games.”
Participants compete in events including memorizing names and faces, the
numbers and suits of a deck of cards, poems, and speed numbers.
In 2005, Joshua Foer attended the championship as a spectator. He then went on
to learn how to train his memory, came back in 2006 as a participant and won
the championship. Foer is the author of Moonwalking
with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything. The book,
which was inspired by an
article he wrote for Slate in
2005, is described in one review as
“[popularizing] scientific concepts in a breezy, accessible fashion while
cheerfully dispensing some practical insights and lots of entertaining
anecdotes.”
No comments:
Post a Comment