Exploring the World Through Tablets
by Rose Pleuler, Intern Fall 2012
Tablets are used in many classrooms today, as they can
put a number of highly effective learning resources literally at
students’ fingertips. The versatility and mobility of the device allows
it to supplement most educational environments. Tablets can provide
access to global content, allowing teachers to show students on a more
interactive level the content of their lessons—perhaps a history teacher
can pull up an audiovisual clip of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have A
Dream“ speech, rather than have students read the text from a book. A
student can also share and create content of his or her own, such as a
web-based book report or a video tutorial.
However, the tablet can be used as more than just lesson supplement.
Consider the tablet’s built-in camera. With each reimagining of the
tablet, the camera is finessed into a more sophisticated medium than
before. Because the quality of the camera is so good, some classroom
innovators are attaching magnifiers and microscopes to tablets. You can
magnify an image up to 20 times larger on a tablet and still yield great
photo quality. Mini-microscopes can accurately enhance pictures up to
40 times larger! This is an exciting and effective tool for the
classroom.
Using the tablet as a microscope, magnifier—or as any tool, for that
matter—allows students to interact directly with the environment and
also encourages students to explore. Instead of showing students a
picture of what a hair follicle looks like, students can investigate on
their own. This hands-on experience in the classroom, where
interactivity was previously confined to the lab environment, is
invaluable.
The inspiration of the tablet resource when used with magnifiers and
microscopes demonstrates how we may choose to investigate the world
around us. Embracing the tablet in the classroom is a fantastic
opportunity for students to connect hands-on exploration, academic
enthusiasm and the important technologies of the now and future.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
The Transition Away from Standard Classroom Learning
The Transition Away from Standard Classroom Learning
by Holly Spicer, Intern Summer 2012
In a world that is becoming increasingly dependent on
technology and the Internet, it should not come as a surprise when parts of our
lives that we take for granted become more computer based. When I was in
elementary and middle school, I used computers only for very basic things, such
as games and word processing, and I hardly used our dial-up Internet access.
Today, there are high school and college programs taken entirely online, a concept
I never could have imagined.
According to a recent Education
News article, in the year 2000
only about forty-five thousand K–12 students took online courses. But in 2010
participation rose to close to four million, showing just how rapidly this
teaching technique is growing. Even in standard classrooms, teachers and
administrators are moving toward an online approach to learning. The Los Altos
School District in California has begun using a technique called blended-learning that incorporates
online lessons into standard classroom teaching: fifth through seventh grade
math classes in Los Altos combine online courses with traditional classroom
learning. The blended-learning style still involves teachers in the learning
process, but these online programs are able to target differences in students’
learning styles to help the individual needs of students and to reward their
improvements.
Online classes and schools are certainly causing a major
change in public education as we know it and will continue to do so. I am part
of a generation that has grown up with in-school classroom learning, and while
it is hard to imagine from a traditional college perspective, the shift toward
more Internet usage in learning is already taking place. It will be difficult
to ever turn completely away from classroom learning, but it will be
interesting to see the developments in these methods as they continue to gain
popularity.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Changing The MCAT
Will
Changing the MCAT Create Better Doctors?
by
Jordan Newell, Intern Summer 2012
One of my most powerful
memories from my childhood is of going to the doctor for my preschool checkup,
where a nurse pricked my finger for a blood test. The room was cold, the nurse
was less than friendly, and I have since developed an intense fear of medical
professionals. An article in The
New York Times reports that I am not alone in my feelings: recent
surveys have shown that many people feel uncomfortable interacting with
physicians. Many patients feel the medical world is driven by technology, and
the patient’s thoughts and feelings tend to get ignored. But can a change in
medical education help improve doctor–patient relationships? The Association of
American Medical Colleges (AAMC) thinks it just might.
A revision of the Medical
College Admissions Test (MCAT) is in the works, and the new exam is projected
to include two new sections that span nearly half of the exam. One section will
cover social and behavioral sciences, while the second will focus on critical
analysis and reading. This section will test students’ ability to analyze passages
covering subjects such as ethics and cross-cultural studies. The new MCAT, to
be administered for the first time in 2015, is an attempt to restore bedside
skills to the medical profession.
Given the changes that the MCAT
will undergo, it is becoming more common for medical schools to require
students to take classes on interviewing and communication techniques in an
effort to create a more holistic admissions process. The New York Times article reports that classes once largely
populated by social science majors have had an extreme increase in enrollment
by premed students.
The first few years following
this change, which will alter the premed educational system, will likely have a
few hiccups and require further adjustments. It is my hope, however, that
implementing these new requirements will allow for better doctor–patient
communication. Barrell G. Kirch, president of the AAMC, states, “The goal is to
improve the admission process to find the people you and I would want as our
doctors.” And that is something I look forward to.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Actor! Actor! . . . Author? Author?
Actor! Actor! . . . Author? Author?
by Kate Carroll
Actors turned singers, turned models, turned . . .
authors? There are several names in Hollywood that have become associated with
the world of literature, including well-known actors such as Steve Martin,
Woody Allen, Carrie Fisher and, as a previous
blog on this topic covered, Julie Andrews. Working at a bookstore has
allowed me to discover a fair share of actor-authors, some presumably for PR
purposes, but also many who actually work at the craft. Here are a few I was
surprised to find have picked up a pen in between sets.
Viggo Mortensen: He’s played a horse whisperer, epically
fought to protect a ring and is a published poet. Add artist, photographer and
polyglot who is fluent in Spanish and Danish to his resume, and what can’t he
do? Mortensen writes in all three languages and enjoys mixed media art, often
combining his poetry with music. His book Coincidence
of Memory, published in 2002, contains a mixture of nearly 25 years of his
work.
Hugh Laurie: The world loves his bitter, sarcastic
humor, so it should be no surprise that his 1996 novel The Gun Seller sold very well, resulting in even a few international
printings. Fans long hoped for a sequel, which he finished over a decade later,
but the title has yet to be released. Laurie has been praised for his ability
to translate his on-screen comic genius into the novel format.
James Franco: I was very surprised when his short story
collection, Palo Alto, came out in
2010. Some agree that this collection is a decent first try, but most believe
Franco tries too hard to impress us with his stylistic choices, abandoning his
characters along the way. Franco has also been published in Ploughshares, a literary magazine based
at my alma mater, Emerson College. I read the entry “The Deer” at work one day;
it wasn’t exactly my taste, but I respect someone who can bring to life both a
trapped climber on screen and a troubled teen on page. Franco is currently
pursuing his PhD in English from Yale.
Other names that might come as surprises when found on
book covers include Chuck Norris, Julie Walters, Macaulay Culkin and John
Travolta. Next time you’re in a bookstore, keep an eye out for some familiar
names—odds are they’ll be set in larger text than the title.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Effects of Childhood Obesity on Academic Performance
Effects of Childhood Obesity on Academic Performance
by Emily Sinclair
While health problems have been the major concern of
recent studies in childhood obesity, new
issues have begun to surface. Several research teams have come to the
general conclusion that obese students, particularly girls, are more likely to
achieve lower test scores or be held back a grade and are less likely to go on
to college than peers at a healthier weight. Sara Gable, PhD, took this
correlation one step further and conducted a more focused, long-term study that
followed 6,250 children from kindergarten through fifth grade. Her results,
recently published in the medical journal Child
Development, found that obese children scored consistently lower on math
tests than nonobese children, even after researchers factored in outside
variables that may have been affecting the children’s test scores, such as
family income, race, mother’s education level/career status and parents’
expectations.
While the link between obesity and lower test scores may
appear to be a straightforward cause-and-effect situation, childhood obesity
experts think that it may be a more complicated case than it appears. In 2011,
Rebecca London, PhD, focused on overall physical
fitness by including body mass index (BMI), strength and endurance; Dr. London
found that the combination was a much better indicator of academic performance
than BMI alone. Self-perception also plays a role; those children who think
themselves overweight or have low self-esteem due to their weight experience
greater academic issues. Dr. London concluded that social skills and emotional
well-being are part of the core issue of obese children performing poorly in
school.
Whether it’s the effect of psychosocial issues caused by
obesity or the myriad of health problems that can accompany it, childhood
obesity clearly plays a negative role in certain students’ academic
experiences. However, there certainly are options for schools to make healthy
changes to deal with this issue. Dr. London suggests a change in mindset;
academia and health need to be thought of as existing in the same realm, rather
than as two separate entities. In recent years, schools have been trying to
focus primarily on improving academic performance without looking at the larger
picture.
Physical education and activity play a huge role in a
child’s ability to learn and perform well, and if those areas are focused on,
it’s easy to imagine that academic performance will improve as a result. Not
only will increased attention towards exercise and physical education help with
national test results, it will help overweight children learn how to be healthy
again and eliminate the emotional and physical problems faced by obese
children. In the end, that’s a goal worth striving for.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Parents Prefer Paper
Parents Prefer Paper
by Jordan Newell, Intern Summer 2012
I have often been called a bookworm, and I’m proud of
it. I love the smell and feel of a book—I’ve spent many years building up my
personal library. When I first heard about the e-book, I thought it was neat,
but not something I would ever rely on. There is just something about the
experience of a print-on-paper book that doesn’t translate into electronic
format. And that’s coming from an adult audience; what about children’s books?
How is anyone supposed to enjoy a pop-up book using a Nook or a Kindle?
Sales of e-books of children’s titles have hardly
changed. Even if they are avid readers of e-books, many parents, according to The
New York Times, prefer their children to have paper books. This
preference is based on the learning experience parents want for their children.
Books are very popular gifts, and parents often flip through an entire book at
the store before purchasing it for their child, something that is not always
possible when shopping online. Because children’s books are known to be
vibrantly colorful and sometimes fun shapes, there is much speculation on the
ability to adapt their designs to electronic devices. The New York Times quotes Junko Yokota, the director for the Center
For Teaching Through Children’s Books at National Louis University in Chicago:
“[Designs] become part of the emotional experience, the intellectual
experience. There’s a lot you can’t standardize and stick into an electronic
format.”
Not to mention, I wouldn’t trust my six-year-old cousin
with my new iPad. To be honest, I probably wouldn’t trust her with a hard copy
of my favorite Harry Potter novel
either, but I would feel safer knowing the book was easier to replace than an
expensive device. My iPad is also a different form of entertainment to my
cousin; she associates it with the games I help her play. I doubt she’d really
be able to focus on reading when she knows which button will let her play her
favorite game. So for now, it seems, the children’s book market will continue
to enjoy the advantages of ink on paper while the parents can hold on to their
gadgets for a little while longer.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Leading Higher Education Technology
Technion-Cornell Goes for the Lead in Higher Education
Technology
by Holly Spicer, Intern Summer 2012
In keeping up with the fast-paced growth of the
technology industry, New York City is fighting to establish itself as the
technological center of the world. Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently began a $2
billion plan for a new tech school in the city, whose first stages were a
competition between 17 of the world’s top universities. The winners, Cornell
University and Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, will build and operate
CornellNYC Tech Campus, a brand-new, high-tech graduate school on New York
City’s Roosevelt Island. Atlantic Philanthropies, founded by a Cornell alumnus,
has donated $350 million to help build the new school.
Education
News reports that Bloomberg’s project proposes to stimulate 20,000
construction jobs and inspire approximately 600 new businesses, creating even
more jobs. In addition, the city will gain $1.4 billion in tax revenue. The new
graduate school is also projected to provide education in math and science for
10,000 children in New York City, enhancing existing programs, as well as
working closely with PS/IS 217 and the Child School, the two elementary schools
already located on Roosevelt Island.
Google has agreed to host Cornell in its New York
offices during construction until Phase I of the project’s construction on
Roosevelt Island is complete in 2017. Cornell and Technion will use some of the
newest technology in the world to create their buildings. The first building,
the Technion-Cornell Innovation Institute (TCII), will be “the largest net-zero
energy building in [the] eastern United States—meaning it will harvest as much
energy from solar power and geothermal wells as it consumes on an annual
basis,” according to a Cornell University press
release.
In terms of education, TCII will offer to master’s
degree candidates their choice of three
specialties or “hubs”: digital media in the networked age; medical
informatics and devices; and smart buildings, urban environments and
infrastructures. With the way technology continues to rapidly improve, new
schools like the Technion-Cornell project will keep cropping up, and there are
potential plans for other universities to create second campuses in New York
City for tech-savvy students who pursue specialized degrees such as these.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
The Flipped Classroom
by Colleen Joyce, Project Manager
I have mostly fond memories of school, but one not-so-fond memory is the frustration I would feel trying to complete my math homework. I never had a problem in other classes, but math—almost any kind of math—always eluded me. I would pay attention in class as the teacher explained how to do something in geometry or calculus, and sometimes I would even think I understood the concept at the time. But as I sat down that evening to complete my homework, it almost never failed that the process of arriving at the correct answers would escape me. My frustration would often result in giving up. Now the idea of “lecture in class, practice at home” is being turned on its head. And it all happened kind of by accident.
In 2004, Salman Khan began posting videos on YouTube to help his cousin who was struggling to learn algebra. Other students found Khan’s videos and started watching them. Similarly, in 2007, teachers Jonathan Bergman and Aaron Sams began to record their lectures and post them online for students. Soon these online lectures started spreading, and the two realized they were on to something. Bergman and Sams began talking to other schools about their methods, and Sal Khan caught the attention of Bill Gates, which gave birth to Khan Academy.
Today, the flipped classroom is being piloted in many schools across the country. Students watch lectures at home about a particular skill, after which skills practice takes place in the classroom aided by a teacher. Clintondale High School near Detroit adopted the model with great success. Before the program, over 50% of freshmen failed English and 44% failed math. After instituting the flipped classroom, the rates dropped to 19% and 13%, respectively. Another by-product of the model was that discipline cases dropped from 736 to 249.
Some experts aren’t sure if the flipped classroom is the model of the future its proponents purport it to be. Ramsey Musallam, writing for Edutopia, addresses some of the criticisms: “Critics . . . argue that online instruction puts students that lack Internet access at a disadvantage. Moreover, . . . lecture is still a poor mode of information transfer.” But Salman Khan has a different take on it: “They could . . . pause and repeat the lectures without worrying that they were wasting my time. They could review topics from previous sessions without feeling embarrassed, and they could tackle new topics without the stress of someone watching over or judging them.”
I cannot go back in time and find out if the flipped classroom model would have ended my math homework frustration, but this concept that is gaining popularity sure is intriguing.
I have mostly fond memories of school, but one not-so-fond memory is the frustration I would feel trying to complete my math homework. I never had a problem in other classes, but math—almost any kind of math—always eluded me. I would pay attention in class as the teacher explained how to do something in geometry or calculus, and sometimes I would even think I understood the concept at the time. But as I sat down that evening to complete my homework, it almost never failed that the process of arriving at the correct answers would escape me. My frustration would often result in giving up. Now the idea of “lecture in class, practice at home” is being turned on its head. And it all happened kind of by accident.
In 2004, Salman Khan began posting videos on YouTube to help his cousin who was struggling to learn algebra. Other students found Khan’s videos and started watching them. Similarly, in 2007, teachers Jonathan Bergman and Aaron Sams began to record their lectures and post them online for students. Soon these online lectures started spreading, and the two realized they were on to something. Bergman and Sams began talking to other schools about their methods, and Sal Khan caught the attention of Bill Gates, which gave birth to Khan Academy.
Today, the flipped classroom is being piloted in many schools across the country. Students watch lectures at home about a particular skill, after which skills practice takes place in the classroom aided by a teacher. Clintondale High School near Detroit adopted the model with great success. Before the program, over 50% of freshmen failed English and 44% failed math. After instituting the flipped classroom, the rates dropped to 19% and 13%, respectively. Another by-product of the model was that discipline cases dropped from 736 to 249.
Some experts aren’t sure if the flipped classroom is the model of the future its proponents purport it to be. Ramsey Musallam, writing for Edutopia, addresses some of the criticisms: “Critics . . . argue that online instruction puts students that lack Internet access at a disadvantage. Moreover, . . . lecture is still a poor mode of information transfer.” But Salman Khan has a different take on it: “They could . . . pause and repeat the lectures without worrying that they were wasting my time. They could review topics from previous sessions without feeling embarrassed, and they could tackle new topics without the stress of someone watching over or judging them.”
I cannot go back in time and find out if the flipped classroom model would have ended my math homework frustration, but this concept that is gaining popularity sure is intriguing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)